<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problem with Paul – Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinechurch.com.au/the-problem-with-paul-part-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinechurch.com.au/the-problem-with-paul-part-2</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 04:34:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angus</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinechurch.com.au/the-problem-with-paul-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinechurch.com.au/?p=89#comment-577</guid>
		<description>It seems to me if Paul is claiming to have been one sent from Jesus in person we have only his word for it and Paul himself doesn&#039;t seem to make any bones about the fact being open and straightforward about the nature of the dispute as he is. Surely this is a little irrelevent however. Even if we can succesfully assaninate the character of Paul, it is not Paul that we follow but Jesus, is it not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me if Paul is claiming to have been one sent from Jesus in person we have only his word for it and Paul himself doesn&#8217;t seem to make any bones about the fact being open and straightforward about the nature of the dispute as he is. Surely this is a little irrelevent however. Even if we can succesfully assaninate the character of Paul, it is not Paul that we follow but Jesus, is it not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
