Comments on: The Holy Trinity – From Babylon To Rome http://www.onlinechurch.com.au/the-holy-trinity-from-babylon-to-rome Mon, 18 Jul 2011 01:40:49 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1 hourly 1 By: David http://www.onlinechurch.com.au/the-holy-trinity-from-babylon-to-rome/comment-page-1#comment-587 David Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:01:08 +0000 http://www.onlinechurch.com.au/?p=82#comment-587 A "trinity god" is not found within the pages of God's holy inspired scriptures, which are from Genesis to Revelation. God is ONE. This ONE GOD has a Son. Jesus Christ is the Son of the ONE GOD. We are instructed in I John 4:15 to confess that Jesus Christ is ... who? God? NO! We are instruceted to confess that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. The Son of God is not also the God he is the Son of. The trinity dogma is utter foolishness, is illogical, and is NOT FOUND IN THE BIBLE. The trinity dogma morphed over centuries, each council making the subtle changes necessary to fully comply with the PAGAN BABYLONIAN TRINITY GOD SYSTEM OF SUN WORSHIP. MYSTERY BABYLON = sun worship and all of its aspects to most certainly include a TRIPLE-HEADED POLYTHEISTIC god. A “trinity god” is not found within the pages of God’s holy inspired scriptures, which are from Genesis to Revelation. God is ONE. This ONE GOD has a Son. Jesus Christ is the Son of the ONE GOD.

We are instructed in I John 4:15 to confess that Jesus Christ is … who? God? NO! We are instruceted to confess that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.

The Son of God is not also the God he is the Son of.

The trinity dogma is utter foolishness, is illogical, and is NOT FOUND IN THE BIBLE.

The trinity dogma morphed over centuries, each council making the subtle changes necessary to fully comply with the PAGAN BABYLONIAN TRINITY GOD SYSTEM OF SUN WORSHIP.

MYSTERY BABYLON = sun worship and all of its aspects to most certainly include a TRIPLE-HEADED POLYTHEISTIC god.

]]> By: Glenda http://www.onlinechurch.com.au/the-holy-trinity-from-babylon-to-rome/comment-page-1#comment-475 Glenda Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:59:57 +0000 http://www.onlinechurch.com.au/?p=82#comment-475 In 'Constitutions' I discovered a text (22) which does use the Greek later additions of Matthew regarding baptism ... (in itlalics in 'Constitutions' to highlight the fact that it is in fact an addition) ... in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit (which is absent from the earlier Hebrew version), but the explanation of this additional Greek terminology does not seem to be promoting a concept of trinity in Constitutions, but rather seems to be appreciatively including all involved (Jesus also said those who accept him also accept the Father, so inclusion is involved in that statement too, without any errant promotion of Jesus and God being one-and-the-same ... much like accepting an authorized agent is the same as accepting the one the agent is representing) Here is the text's explanation why each of these entities is mentioned " :- of the Father that sent, of the Christ that came, of the Paraclete that testified" This does not seem to attempt to equate flesh Jesus as being God. Just thought I'd share, because it's the first time I've ever read that terminology with a very old clarifyer which doesn't seem to promote any trinity. Also, when God uses special agents, God often places His Name in them eg the angel who led the exodus EX 23:21 Beware of him, and obey his voice, provoke him not; for he will not pardon your transgressions: for my name [is] in him. To baptize in the name of Jesus/Ya-Hoshua, is to baptize in the name of the Father, since God's Name is in him. It's not a flesh person we are meant to worship, but rather we are meant to worship God acting through that person MT 15:31 Insomuch that the multitude wondered, when they saw the dumb to speak, the maimed to be whole, the lame to walk, and the blind to see: and they glorified the God of Israel. Jesus/Yeshua told us to behave likewise MT 5:16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven. In ‘Constitutions’ I discovered a text (22) which does use the Greek later additions of Matthew regarding baptism … (in itlalics in ‘Constitutions’ to highlight the fact that it is in fact an addition) … in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit (which is absent from the earlier Hebrew version), but the explanation of this additional Greek terminology does not seem to be promoting a concept of trinity in Constitutions, but rather seems to be appreciatively including all involved (Jesus also said those who accept him also accept the Father, so inclusion is involved in that statement too, without any errant promotion of Jesus and God being one-and-the-same … much like accepting an authorized agent is the same as accepting the one the agent is representing)

Here is the text’s explanation why each of these entities is mentioned ” :- of the Father that sent, of the Christ that came, of the Paraclete that testified”

This does not seem to attempt to equate flesh Jesus as being God.

Just thought I’d share, because it’s the first time I’ve ever read that terminology with a very old clarifyer which doesn’t seem to promote any trinity.

Also, when God uses special agents, God often places His Name in them eg the angel who led the exodus EX 23:21 Beware of him, and obey his voice, provoke him not; for he will not pardon your transgressions: for my name [is] in him.

To baptize in the name of Jesus/Ya-Hoshua, is to baptize in the name of the Father, since God’s Name is in him.

It’s not a flesh person we are meant to worship, but rather we are meant to worship God acting through that person
MT 15:31 Insomuch that the multitude wondered, when they saw the dumb to speak, the maimed to be whole, the lame to walk, and the blind to see: and they glorified the God of Israel.
Jesus/Yeshua told us to behave likewise
MT 5:16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.

]]> By: Glenda http://www.onlinechurch.com.au/the-holy-trinity-from-babylon-to-rome/comment-page-1#comment-360 Glenda Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:18:22 +0000 http://www.onlinechurch.com.au/?p=82#comment-360 REV 16:19 And the great city was divided into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell: and great Babylon came in remembrance before God, to give unto her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of his wrath. REV 16:19 And the great city was divided into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell: and great Babylon came in remembrance before God, to give unto her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of his wrath.

]]>